Brainwashed – Theory, Science and Reality

Power For Living

Brainwashed – Theory, Science and Reality

Brainwashed – Theory, Science and Reality

In recent history a discipline known as science has been co-opted by a certain intellectual elite with a materialist agenda. As a result, a great deal of confusion has been created over our origins, in a large part due to the slight of hand that presents so-called scientific theories as facts. It is, in effect, a form of officially endorsed and socially acceptable brainwashing. The truth is that these theories fail the test of true science in every regard. They are unprovable and unproven, yet are taught as though they were scientific “facts”.  We will dissect the most prominent of these theories and expose them for what they are.

Evolution: The 160 year old theory that is dead in the primordial water.

According to the Theory of Evolution, life began on this planet as the result of a completely random process of miraculous proportions. Given the complexities inherent in a single living cell, the chances against biological life beginning on this planet by pure chance is astronomical. Because of the complexities inherent within DNA, it has been proposed that life passed through an RNA World phase that did not require DNA and proteins. In living cells, most catalysts are protein enzymes, composed of amino acids, but in the 1980s another kind of catalyst was discovered. These are RNA molecules composed of nucleotides that are now called ribozymes. A ribozyme can act both as a catalyst and as a carrier of genetic information in its nucleotide sequence.

However, if we want to assume that life arose from the ribozyme, a probability calculation that a specific ribozyme might assemble by chance can be made, assuming that a functional ribozyme is 300 nucleotides long, and that at each position there could be any of four nucleotides present. The chances of that ribozyme assembling by chance are then 4^300,  a number so large that it could not possibly happen by chance even once in 13 billion years, the currently theorized estimated age of the universe.

Highly educated individuals from a number of academic fields have weighed the DNA/RNA evidence and the statistical probabilities:

Two well-known scientists calculated the odds of life forming by natural processes. They estimated that there is less than 1 chance in 10 to the 40,000 power that life could have originated by random trials. 10 to the 40,000 power is a 1 with 40,000 zeros after it.

“…life cannot have had a random beginning…The trouble is that there are about two thousand enzymes, and the chance of obtaining them all in a random trial is only one part in 10 to the 40,000 power, an outrageously small probability that could not be faced even if the whole universe consisted of organic soup. If one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific training into the conviction that life originated (by a random “natural” process) on the Earth, this simple calculation wipes the idea entirely out of court….The enormous information content of even the simplest living systems…cannot in our view be generated by what are often called “natural” processes… For life to have originated on the Earth it would be necessary that quite explicit instruction should have been provided for its assembly… There is no way in which we can expect to avoid the need for information, no way in which we can simply get by with a bigger and better organic soup, as we ourselves hoped might be possible a year or two ago.” – Fred Hoyle, English astronomer and cosmologist and N. Chandra Wickramasinghe, mathematician, astronomer and astrobiologist.

Chemist Dr. John Grebe, former Director of the Dow Chemical Company Physical Chemistry Research Laboratories in Midland, Michigan: “That organic evolution could account for the complex forms of life in the past and the present has long since been abandoned by men who grasp the importance of the DNA genetic code.”

Researcher and mathematician I.L. Cohen: “At that moment, when the DNA/RNA system became understood, the debate between Evolutionists and Creationists should have come to a screeching halt… the implications of the DNA/RNA were obvious and clear… Mathematically speaking, based on probability concepts, there is no possibility that Evolution is the mechanism that created the approximately 6,000,000 species of plants and animals we recognize today.”

Evolutionist Michael Denton: “The complexity of the simplest known type of cell is so great that it is impossible to accept that such an object could have been thrown together suddenly by some kind of freakish, vastly improbable, event. Such an occurrence would be indistinguishable from a miracle.”

English philosopher and atheist Anthony Flew: “What I think the DNA material has done is that it has shown, by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce (life), that intelligence must have been involved in getting these extraordinarily diverse elements to work together. It’s the enormous complexity of the number of elements and the enormous subtlety of the ways they work together. The meeting of these two parts at the right time by chance is simply minute. It is all a matter of the enormous complexity by which the results were achieved, which looked to me like the work of intelligence.”

Evolutionists argue that under the right circumstances non-living things could have produced life, but this has never been seen to happen anywhere on earth or even been accomplished in a lab, even under strictly controlled conditions, using specifically chosen ingredients, with highly educated scientists directly controlling the experiment. None of these experiments have ever created life out of non-living matter or mimic what would have occurred completely by chance in a primordial pre-biotic environment, unless you want to believe that there was also a primordial pre-biotic laboratory and a highly educated primordial pre-biotic scientist present.

The reality is that only irreducibly complex living things produce life. If there is such a thing as biological evolution, it must be operating as a highly complex program specifically designed to produce a specific outcome. It is impossible that a completely mindless and random process could detect and then adequately adjust highly complex organisms at the cellular level as a response to changes in the environment. The real scientific evidence indicates that life forms will adapt to changes in the environment over time, or they will die out. They do not adapt to the point that they become completely new organisms.

In earth’s history, the mindless and random process of evolution has had more than a few obstacles to negotiate. Below is the timeline of life and the mass extinction events currently accepted by modern science:

End of the Cretaceous period, 66 million years ago, 76% of all species lost.
134 million years previous…

End of the Triassic period, 200 million years ago, 80% of species lost.
51 million years previous…

End of the Permian period, 251 million years ago, 96% of species lost.
124 million years previous…

Late Devonian extinction, 375 million years ago, 75% of species lost.
69 million years previous…

End of the Ordovician period, 444 million years ago, 86% of species lost.
44 million years previous…

The Cambrian–Ordovician extinction event, or events, approximately 488 million years ago. 50% to 80% of species lost.
62 million years previous…

Cambrian Explosion, 541 to 550 million years ago. The earliest known life forms appear during this period. The Cambrian Explosion was marked by the sudden arrival of most major animal phyla that appear in the fossil record with no identifiable precursors or ancestors. It lasted for about 13–25 million years and resulted in the divergence of most modern metazoan phyla.

A hundred and sixty years have passed since Charles Darwin complained that the Cambrian fossil record was his most perplexing problem, and noted that “at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.” Nothing has changed, except that after two centuries of fossil collecting, the fossil record has “evolved” into an even worse problem.

There is precious little time for the “explosion” of life in the Cambrian period. Considering the enormous complexity of living organisms, there is also precious little time for a completely blind and random process to make up for the enormous loss of life recorded in these mass extinction events. Evolutionists use “time” to support their theories, as if time explains everything, holding to the intractable dogma that simply given enough “time” any number of statistically improbable events and mutations can happen. This doesn’t rise to the level of true science, as it is in fact nothing more than theoretical wishful thinking.

According to the latest estimates 99.9 percent of all known species that have ever existed on Earth are lost to us… they are gone—extinct. If that is the case, there must be something more to the existence of biological life than an unguided, random and gradual evolutionary progression as proposed by modern “science”.  In a complex planetary ecosystem, a random and mindless process cannot afford to lose 99.9% of its progressive data and continue to function, if it can function at all.

From Monkey to Human – Missing links gone wild from beginning to end.

You might be surprised to learn that humans are not descended from monkeys or any other primate living today. It is theorized that humans share a common ape ancestor with chimpanzees. It supposedly lived between 8 and 6 million years ago. It is also theorized that humans and chimpanzees evolved differently from that same ancestor and that all apes and monkeys share a more distant relative, which lived about 25 million years ago.

Chimpanzees are 96% genetically similar to humans. This is because large chunks of our genome perform similar functions across the animal kingdom. 90% of the genes in the Abyssinian domestic cat are similar to humans. Domesticated cattle share about 80% of their genes with humans. 60% of chicken genes have a human gene counterpart. Bananas share about 60% of the same DNA as humans.

According to the latest mainstream opinion, modern chimps have been around for longer than modern humans have, less than 1 million years compared to 300,000 for Homo sapiens, according to the most recent estimates. It is also theorized that we’ve been on separate evolutionary paths for 6 million or 7 million years or so. If we think of chimps as our cousins, our last common ancestor is like a great, great grandmother with only two living descendants.

What evolutionists know about the last “common ancestor” of chimps and humans.

The reality is that we don’t have a complete fossil record for humans or chimps, but scientists have combined fossil evidence with genetic and behavioral clues gleaned from living primates to “learn about” the now-extinct species whose descendants would become humans and chimps.

How do we know this “now-extinct species whose descendants would become humans and chimps” actually existed? Unfortunately… we don’t.  Evolutionists created this “now extinct” common ancestor and conveniently plugged it into our ancestry.

According to Lynne Isbell, a professor of anthropology at the University of California, Davis – “We don’t have its remains, and I’m not sure if we’d be able to place it with certainty in the human lineage if we did,” Isbell said. Scientists imagine this creature looked more like a chimpanzee than a human, and it “probably” spent most of its time in the canopy of forests dense enough that it could travel from tree to tree without touching the ground.

Another major problem is that humans have one less chromosome than chimps and gorillas. We have 23 pairs. Chimpanzees and gorillas, supposedly our closest living relatives, have 24. Humans have an odd telomere to telomere fusion in chromosome number 2. A telomere is a region of repetitive nucleotide sequences at each end of a chromosome, which protects the end of the chromosome from deterioration or from fusion with neighboring chromosomes.

Evolutionary biologists answer this problem by explaining that we just combined a couple of them. Every now and then, chromosomes fuse. Scientists have observed both humans and mammals with fused chromosomes. Fused chromosomes are real, and there are surprising number of normal, healthy people carrying them. These naturally fused chromosomes do not result in a new species… with the exception of humans and chimps of course, because it has to happen that way to make their theory work. To get from apes to humans requires more than a happenstance chromosomal fusion. It requires a complex sequence of things happening and 10 million years to pull it off.

According to evolutionary theorists, a comparison of the human, chimpanzee, and gorilla genomes confirms that the extinct and unknown ancestors of gorillas branched off from the extinct and unknown ancestors of chimpanzees and humans about ten million years ago. Humans and chimpanzees then branched apart later. Okay, so where exactly is the time stamp on a genome that says “Hey, I happened ten million years ago!” ? There isn’t one… so don’t ask.

It is theorized that one chromosome flipped, then a chunk of yet another chromosome got stuck to the end of the first one, and then a new piece of DNA also got stuck to the first one. Where did this “new piece of DNA” come from? That’s not important. It just kinda happened that way. The unknown ancestors of gorillas then supposedly diverged from the unknown ancestors of chimpanzees and humans. And then humans diverged from the unknown ancestors of chimpanzees. Supposedly they underwent some ten million years of independent evolution, during which time “a lot happened”. A lot meaning a lot of happenstance duplication, copying, pasting, fusing, flipping and deletion of genetic material. That’s why it took 10 million years…

Now it is possible for a real geneticist to make this all work on paper. Sort of. It just requires a lot of complicated “stuff” to happen in the right order over millions of years and the creation of some common ancestors we have no hard evidence of ever existing. However, we are assured that we can create them if necessary.

In contrast, the ancient Sumerians had there own theory regarding this genetic manipulation. It wasn’t accidental and didn’t take millions of years. It was done by an advanced race who knew a thing or two about genetics and blended their genome with earthly life. Initially these genetically modified creatures were unable to reproduce on their own, but were later genetically modified again to make reproduction possible.

So aside from the theories of accidental and unguided processes that take millions of years to sort themselves out, what “proof” do we really have? Evolutionary geneticist Soojin Yi of the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta stated that: “Proof is very hard to come by in evolution biology, unfortunately.”

The current evidence suggests that tracing back human origins millions of years takes a leap of faith. A new landmark study has revealed the oldest known human DNA ever to be found, dating back approximately 400,000 years – substantially older than the previous earliest human DNA from a 100,000-year-old Neanderthal. Initial analysis on the DNA reveals a complex and confusing interbreeding of species which took place in our ancient past, and scientists are still scratching their heads over exactly what kind of species the DNA belonged to. The genetic material came from the bone of a hominin found in Sima de los Huesos, the “bone pit”, which is a cave site in Northern Spain that has yielded the world’s largest assembly of hominin fossils from the Middle Pleistocene, consisting of at last 28 skeletons. The Sima de los Huesos humans may be related to the ancestors of both Neanderthals and Denisovans, but we would then have to explain how two very different DNA lineages stemmed from one group, one leading to Denisovans, the other to Neanderthals. This is the second study which has found evidence of a species currently unknown to science which bred with ancient human ancestors. “The story of human evolution is not as simple as we would have liked to think,” Matthias Meyer, a molecular biologist, said. “This result is a big question mark. In some sense, we know less about the origins of Neanderthals and Denisovans than we knew before.”

So, there you have it. Massive gaps and missing links at the end and at the beginning of the monkey to human evolutionary tree. The reality is that there is absolutely no conclusive evidence that apes or monkeys “evolved” into humans. It is a theory presented as fact in a way that is designed to brainwash the unsuspecting public.

How does Evolution really work? The imaginary tree…

So how does this Theory of Evolution work? We are told that systematic biologists cultivate a unique orchard. Following in the footsteps of Charles Darwin, they grow phylogenetic trees — branching diagrams that depict lines of evolutionary descent back to a common ancestor. And how do they do that?

Evolutionists use a number of tools to reconstruct the tree of life. They depend heavily on cladistics, a method of hypothesizing relationships among organisms. Think of it as creating a family tree with blank spaces for unknown ancestors. They also turn to molecular sequencing in which they reveal the hierarchy of relationships among different organisms by comparing their molecular details. Think of a family tree again, only this time using DNA evidence to figure out what goes where on the chart. The major fly in the ointment using this method is that you cannot extract DNA or conduct molecular sequencing using fossils.

Another major problem is that the fossil record is quite incomplete, and the fossil record grows even more incomplete the further back in time we attempt to look. Some organisms, believed to be more recent, don’t appear either. Important links in the fossil record also remain unaccounted for, such as the ancient last common ancestors connecting entire phyla. Research into the process of fossilization continues to reveal just how much of the record we’re missing.

So, taken on its own, the fossil record is considerably lacking in many areas. So evolutionists use fossils, cladistics and molecular sequencing together to form a larger picture that (supposedly) correctly documents the evolution of life. But how can this actually be true if the fossil record is severely lacking, cladistics is based on a method of hypothesizing relationships and molecular sequencing cannot be performed on fossils? The latest findings indicate that using these methods has not resulted in a satisfactory outcome.

Modern genetics has revealed that representing evolutionary history as a tree is misleading, with scientists now saying a more realistic way to represent the origins and inter-relatedness of species would be an impenetrable thicket, not a tree.

Eric Bapteste, an evolutionary biologist at the Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris, told New Scientist magazine that: “We have no evidence at all that the tree of life is a reality.”

So, what’s the new idea? Simply put, crossbreeding. However, statistically speaking, the majority of crossbreeds are sterile, although a few of the offspring can be fertile. Furthermore, crossbreeding can only occur with plants and animals that belong to the same families or subfamilies.

Michael Rose, an evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Irvine said,  “The tree of life is being politely buried. What’s less accepted is that our whole fundamental view of biology needs to change.”

The End Game… Identity Deleted

First of all, we should point out that those promoting or were promoting these theories are not trying to deliberately brainwash anyone, as many of them are unaware that they themselves have been brainwashed. However entrenched evolutionary theory may be, it’s proponents have been brainwashed to ignore the fact that it is statistically impossible that a mindless and undirected process could have produced life on this planet, let alone engineer that first life in such a way that it could produce a viable and sustainable ecosystem and “evolve” into far more complex organisms. A mindless process doesn’t remember where it began and has no idea where it is going, and particularly when it comes to the enormous complexity of biological life, any mis-step along the way would ultimately prove to be catastrophic and fatal. A mindless process cannot retrace its steps to see where it may have gone wrong or even know that it has gone wrong. Time is not the friend of an unplanned and unguided evolutionary process no matter how many billions or millions of years you throw at it.

So what is the purpose of this brainwashing in the name of science? The end-game of the powers behind this brainwashing is to disassociate human beings from the knowledge of their true origins, for if humans knew this they would never bow down to the control of a king, a queen, a priest, a guru, or a government that was solely interested in promoting its own agenda. People who believe that they are simply accidents of nature are easily co-opted into serving and submitting to the powers of the state. It is no mere coincidence that the former Soviet Union endorsed, and modern China endorses and enforces atheism. It is also not an accident that an atheist – materialist worldview is being foisted on the modern educational system as being both rational and scientific when it is, in fact, neither.

In the “good old days”, these self-serving powers might adopt and then progressively co-opt a particular belief system or religion to accomplish the same agenda. In past history Christianity was used and abused to create and maintain power structures and justify despicable acts that its original founders would have vehemently condemned. More recently, atheistic materialism has become the chosen vessel. Regardless of the method, the end game is the same… mind control. The sad part is that the human participants on many levels are completely unaware that they are merely the pawns in a game being played by vastly superior intelligences.

—————————————————————————————

“The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you’re inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save… You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it… I’m trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You’re the one that has to walk through it…” Morpheus, The Matrix  

Tags: , , ,